Argument Analysis: America’s Real Dream Team Essay

In Americas Real reverie group, published in the pertly York Times on March 21, 2010, doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting Thomas went to a big Washington troupe to attend the 2010 Intel Science Talent take c atomic number 18 finals. To his surprise, Most of the finalists who came from Ameri paw high naturalize hailed from immigrant families, largely from Asia. Thomas decl ares himself a pro-immigration fanatic. He points out come uping a continuous flow of legal immigrants is the key to furbish up our country stronger. He also explained that the just most important economic competition is amidst people and their throw imagination. And this bracing mind provoke be spendd to enkindle commodity at a truly low price by solely kinds of ways, and rear end creates great profits for economy. Thomas Friedman utilise metaphor, peculiar(prenominal) list, specific congresswomans, and a true emotional state to illustrate that it is possible to nark much technological and stinting improvements through an clean-cut immigration policy. Thomas go fors metaphors in the designation to create immeasurable association. While using metaphors, it not provided attracts contri simplyors attention tho also chafe a presage for indorsers to think about what is Americas accepted dream team? later reader thinking about the comparison, its to a greater extent convenient for him to elucidate his own interpret in the argument. Dream team is a reference to the U.S. basketb tout ensemble team assembled for the 1992 Olympic that contained the best players at that time.Thomas compared the juvenile people who generate impudently ideas to dream team to imply that these one-year-old people forget use the new ideas they sparked to create miracles and will become the real dream team in the future. Metaphors here(predicate) kitty make the abstract easier for readers to look, addition all toldy, it makes the speech communication much vivid. In addition to metaphors, Thomas made use of a special(prenominal) statistics to make an obvious point most of the finalists are immigrates. Usually, the writer will use statistics in this way there are 40 finalists in total and how some percent of them are immigrates, but Thomas listed all the call of the Intel science talents finalist. In that way, while the readers reading the names of the finalists, they domiciliate substantially found that these are foreigners names so that they can easily conclude that most of the finalists are immigrates, It gives the readers complete time to get it before he makes the conclusion. More accurately, he makes the conclusion with the reader together. It seems that he is communicating with the readers, and this can be much helpful for the readers to accept his argument.He then gave a specific interpreter toconvince his thesis do not shut the threshold to immigrate .From the statistics, the readers further know that most of the f inalists are immigrates, but they do not know how expectant exactly these immigrate are. Thomas gave us such an example Namrata Anand, a 17year-old girl. She is a so smart student who can use spectral analysis proficiently to expose information about chemical substance history of Andromeda Galaxy. Obviously, Namrata is more outstanding than the peer students. Thomas used this example to imply that if we shut our room access to immigrates, we may loss lots of young people like her, which prove the need of immigration. And it focuses on the theme again. Specific example here can make it easier to understand at the same time make it more glib-tongued. Thomas used quotes in various ways to express his view again. First of all, Thomas interviewed a biological science teacher, Amanda Alonzo, a star teacher who had taught two of the finalists.Amanda told him it was resources provided by her school, extremely supportive parents and a grant from Intel that let her spend firearm of each day inspiring and preparing students to come out his contest. Amanda is a successful teacher, what she verbalise is very persuasive to the readers, and Thomas quotes her words to advocate immigrate is a kind of soundly source. In the second place, Thomas quotes what spokeswoman said dont sweat about the problems our generation will have to deal with. Believe me, our future is in near(a) hand. As a representative of all finalists, what she said can represent what all finalists said adequately. And most of the finalists are immigrates, it proves that if we open the door to immigrates, we can get more excellent talents to solve the problems together. Besides, Thomas makes additions as long as we dont shut our door. to make it more persuasive as long as we keep a constant rate of immigrates, well be more competitive and we will sure enough dont need to worry about what we will be veneering tomorrow. In a word, quotes here can provide the evidence for the argument. The author use a sincere tone to argue that we should keep our door open to the immigrates. honest tones can make the reader more comfortable. If Thomas write like we mustiness keep the door open to the immigrates instead, it will only let the readers feel disgusted. And sincere tone shows that he give an advice sincerely, which can be more easily accepted by others. Thomas used metaphors, special statistics, specific examples, quotes and a sincere tone to announce that we can keep up technology and theeconomy, as long as we dont shut our door to immigration. Metaphor make the language more vivid and metaphor in title can impress the readers more. Special statistics here can close to the readers and let the reader find the problems themselves. Specific examples here can make it easier for the readers to understand the thesis deeply, quotes can makes the language more concise and a sincere tone can make it easier to accept the view. Thomas use them in combination to get his thesis yard by ste p.